From: Seun Ojedeji
Date: Saturday 26 September 2015 18:03
To: James Gannon
Cc: Kavouss Arasteh, Dr Eberhard W Lisse, Lisse Eberhard, Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Kavouss alternative proposal
@James without making any preference on what have been shared, I think you seem to focus on the model and not necessarily the required community powers (which is the accountability enhancement).
Membership is not a requirement for accountability and certainly its not a requirement by NTIA. What is a requirement is proof that ICANN would be more accountable post-transition (and I said ICANN because its include not just board/staff but also the community).
So I suggest we approach this with a more open mind and focus on what is required and not what we want.
Regards