The Executive Summary CANNOT be a case of "there's never time to do it right, but always time to do it again."

We have one shot to get this right.  If we fire before we aim, we will shoot ourselves in the collective foot.

That said, it's a fairly credible first draft, given the circumstances.  Pretending that it's ready for prime time after a 24 hour review period is dangerously delusional.

My younger son is a gifted writer.  In middle school English, he could get away with handing in first drafts.  In high school, he got his head handed to him for doing so -- now he knows better.  We are not in middle school anymore.

Greg

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> wrote:
So,

besides the damning criticism on substance, both *BOTH* our law firms politely 
point out that out timeline (deadline) is not conducive.

And not only their time to review, but also the time to write this "summary".

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

On 11 Nov 2015, at 03:53, Rosemary E. Fei <rfei@adlercolvin.com> wrote:

[...]


Adler & Colvin’s comments on the Executive Summary are attached; our apologies for missing the deadline (by 110 minutes).  As Holly noted, these comments have not been reviewed by or coordinated with Sidley.  Similarly, we have not had time to go back through proposals, emails, and meeting notes to confirm our recollection of how various decisions have been made to date, so some comments may reflect the wrong understanding and should be ignored.  

[...]


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community