| 09:57 (Il y a 7 heures)![]() | ![]() ![]() | ||
| ||||
The rationale for other GAC advice in the form of inter-sessional correspondence is made as clear as possible in the correspondence itself.
The GAC Register of Advice could be made clearer and more accessible and this is being addressed.
GAC Open Forums at face-to-face meetings are an opportunity for the community to seek further clarification from GAC on processes.
The GAC will:
· Continue working with ICANN staff to improve the GAC Register of Advice, including a record of how the ICANN Board responded to each item of advice.
· Ensure that the GAC website review addresses the intent of this recommendation.
· Consider further options for explaining its advice at face-to-face meetings and in writing.
Regards
Tom Dale
ACIG GAC Secretariat
Mathieu — Regarding formal advice from any Advisory Committee (AC), many commenters reiterated that a rationale should be a requirement for advice to be considered by the board. (BC, NPOC, Google, USCIB, RySG, Valideus, the US Chamber, RrSG, NCUC, I2C, Intel, IPC)
It’s not enough to require that each AC "will make every effort”.
From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>
Date: Monday, January 18, 2016 at 3:10 AM
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, Mike Chartier <mike.s.chartier@intel.com>
Cc: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
Mike,
Good catch indeed. Precisely the point of our first reading exercise.
So we will add this to recommendation 11 agenda item tomorrow.
I will note that the current annex includes a related recommendation :
· Insert a mention for all ACs: “The AC will make every effort to ensure that the advice provided is clear and supported by a rationale.”
Best,
Mathieu
De : accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Greg Shatan
Envoyé : lundi 18 janvier 2016 05:30
À : Chartier, Mike S
Cc : accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
Mike,
Good point and good catch. This should not have been overlooked.
Greg
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Chartier, Mike S <mike.s.chartier@intel.com> wrote:
I think this is another illustration of how we need to be careful in documenting the process for handling comments (other than the Boards). For Recommendation 11 several commenters offered the proposal to add a requirement for GAC advice to be accompanied by a rationale. Given the general acceptance of proposals for rationales in other areas, I would have thought it would have at least been given a note in the prep document.
Look forward to discussing on Tues.
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:01 PM
To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
Sent on behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs
In preparation for your Recommendation 11 – GAC Advice (first reading) discussion scheduled for your call #78 - Tuesday, 19 January 2016 (12:00 – 15:00 UTC) - please find attached the material to review.
Please use this email thread to circulate any comments you may have in advance of the call.
Thank you
Mathieu, Thomas, León
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community