There is much that can be said in response to these submissions – including the substantive corrections that has been offered by Greg, which I endorse completely.  Any suggestion that the subgroup report is the product of an “incorrect census-level designation made by the Chair” is false as to fact and the suggestion should be withdrawn.

 

At this point, however, the only other thing that needs saying is that the views of Parminder and the Brazilian government were extensively discussed in the subgroup and never garnered majority support (much less support approaching consensus).  As such, the dissenting views of the minority are just that – minority views reflecting the opinion of a small dissatisfied group of dissenters.

 

The subgroup was open to participation from everyone in the ICANN community and it did reach consensus on the two issues presented, which I commend to the favorable attention of the plenary.

 

Paul

 

Paul Rosenzweig

paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

www.redbranchconsulting.com

My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

 

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of parminder
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 2:22 PM
To: Thiago Braz Jardim Oliveira <thiago.jardim@itamaraty.gov.br>; accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Cc: acct-staff@icann.org; gac@icann.org; GAC <gac@gac.icann.org>; ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Subgroup. Draft Report. Statement of Brazil. Annex. To be annexed to the draft report. For consideration by the CCWG.

 

Dear All

I fully support the excellent "statement of Brazil", which makes the required point very well. The sub-group should consider the draft recommendations made in the statement. In default, the CCWG should directly consider them.

My own dissenting opinion is enclosed. It is in two parts, part 1 is about what was the group's mandate to do but it failed to do. This part first expresses support to Brazil's statement, and then makes additional points, detailing how there has been a miscarriage of due process, and thus justifying why Brazil's draft recs must be considered, in the required elaborate manner. Part one is enclosed herewith.

Part two will present  some comments on and disagreements with regard to the two sets of draft recs that have been submitted on the sub-group's behalf. I am still to write them, so allow me to submit them in the next 12 hours, which will still be the weekend in some parts of the world, and thus within the deadline I hope.

Best regards, parminder

 

On Sunday 15 October 2017 06:43 AM, Thiago Braz Jardim Oliveira wrote:

Dear all,

 

On behalf of the Brazilian Government, I hereby submit the "Statement of Brazil" and its annex, which are to be annexed to the draft report of the jurisdiction subgroup, submitted on 11 October 2017, for consideration by the CCWG plenary.

 

Best regards,

 

Thiago

 

 

 

De: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] em nome de Greg Shatan [gregshatanipc@gmail.com]
Enviado: quinta-feira, 12 de outubro de 2017 23:29
Para: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Cc: acct-staff@icann.org; ws2-jurisdiction
Assunto: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Subgroup Draft Report for CCWG-Accountability Plenary Review

All,

 

One of the Subgroup members pointed out a minor editing error in the document.  On pages 13-14, there were several mentions of the RAA, when in fact the language quoted and discussed was from the ICANN Terms and Conditions for Registrar Accreditation Application.  (The reference was correct in the Executive Summary.)  This has now been fixed in the attached.

 

Greg 

 

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

All,

 

Some minor formatting errors crept into the Report when it was converted from Word to PDF.  A new PDF of the report is attached. I've checked each page to confirm that the formatting errors were resolved.

 

Thank you to Jorge Cancio for catching this problem!

 

Greg

 

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

All,

 

I am pleased to submit the Draft Report from the Jurisdiction Subgroup for consideration by the CCWG-Accountability Plenary.

 

It is my understanding that a minority viewpoint is expected to be submitted.  In the interests of time, this will be submitted to the Plenary separately from the Draft Report.

 

During the preparation of the OFAC Recommendation, the Subgroup considered an email where a registrar declined to do business with a potential reseller, based on the registrar’s policy of not doing business with people with Iranian passports.  The Subgroup also learned that this registrar, which had been registering domains for a number of Iranian nationals, refused to continue to do business with them.  The Subgroup has concluded that, to the extent these instances are related to OFAC, the concerns raised by these instances are adequately covered in the Recommendation already without any additional changes.  This is not in any way a comment on the validity of these particular concerns.  The Subgroup will consider creating "stress tests" based on these scenarios.

 

I look forward to the Plenary's reading of the Draft Report.

 

Best regards,

 

Greg Shatan

Rapporteur

 

 




_______________________________________________
Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction