El 20/04/2015, a las 23:22, List for the work of CCWG-Accountability Legal SubTeam <ccwg-accountability5@icann.org> escribió:_______________________________________________I am forwarding Chris Disspain's email into the Legal Sub Team for further consideration. I will let our counsels respond, should the Legal Sub Team's discussion result in a referral of the questions to counsel.Greg Shatan---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:03 AM
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Legal question
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>Hello All,I’m not sure if this email should be addressed to the whole group, the legal sub-team or some other. Anyway, I have some questions that I would appreciate answers to from the CCWG’s lawyers. Happy to discuss on the upcoming CCWG call.Under the current structure of ICANN and its SOs and ACs1. Is it correct that a bylaw saying that a combination of those SOs and ACs can veto the budget or veto a bylaw change can be drafted and put in to the bylaws?2. Is it correct that were there to be such a bylaw and the SOs and ACs were to veto the budget or a bylaw change pursuant to that bylaw then the Board of ICANN could ignore that veto and that the SOs and ACs could not enforce the veto?3. Is it correct that the veto bylaw could be drafted to require binding arbitration in the event that the Board refused to follow the SO/AC veto and if so would the Board be bound by the arbitration finding?4. Is it correct that a Board spill bylaw could be inserted in to the bylaws and if triggered would be enforceable?
Cheers,
Chris
On 18 Apr 2015, at 14:50 , León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:All,<Legal Assessment_ Governance Chart.pdf>I am forwarding this document from Counsel for your records and for its relevance for our overall work.Best regards,LeónInicio del mensaje reenviado:Fecha: 17 de abril de 2015 22:21:36 GMT-5De: List for the work of CCWG-Accountability Legal SubTeam <ccwg-accountability5@icann.org>Asunto: [Acct-Legal] (no subject)Responder a: ccwg-accountability5@icann.orgDear Legal Sub-Team, Attached please find revisions to the chart comparing the member and designator approaches from Sidley and Adler & Colvin as requested. Please note that in our cover memo we have posed several questions for your consideration. We have also provided a discussion of some considerations regarding implementation of both approaches. We are look forward to discussing with CCWG next week. Kind regards, Holly****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.
****************************************************************************************************______________________________________________________________________________________________
Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list
Ccwg-accountability5@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list
Ccwg-accountability5@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5