I do understand the need to pass to actual work at this point, but for the sake of the record and since this matter will be taken up at/by the plenary, I would also say that my personal position is closest to Avri's as expressed in this thread.

Best,

2017-06-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>:
Thanks to Avri for her clarifications and bringing some common sense to this issue.

kind regards

Jorge


________________________________

Von: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
Datum: 15. Juni 2017 um 22:18:22 MESZ
An: avri doria <avri@apc.org>
Cc: accountability-cross-community@icann.org <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>, ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>
Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-jurisdiction] Documents for upcoming meeting

On 15 Jun 2017 8:53 PM, "avri doria" <avri@apc.org<mailto:avri@apc.org>> wrote:

To the degree that the current decision is immutable, after one reading,
on excluding both a planned move and discussion of any immunities, I do
not support the decision. I do support putting aside any discussion of
moving or of immunities incompatible with our current accountability
schemes, but also do support discussion of possible immunities/remedies
that do not harm the current accountability schemes.

SO: FWIW, I will add my +1 to the above statement.

Regards

thanks
avri



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



--
Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix
Sciences Po Law School 2014-2017
LinkedIn - @rbl0012 - M: +33 7 86 39 18 15