Same issue I raised with Bruce.
I don't understand the concept of a Cross Community WG chartered by only
one AC/SO.
Alan
At 04/02/2016 05:12 PM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
Dear all,
After the thorough and fruitful discussions held throughout the various
plenary calls, we have finalized Recommendation 6 yesterday. However the
Board also proposed a significant compromise which seems to have gathered
acceptance from many in our CCWG community involved in the development of
Recommendation 6.
This seems to be the best approach to achieve a compromise as it seems
that it is something most can live with and few really like.
As such the co-chairs will recommend this compromise by the Board be
accepted by the CCWG as its new consensus position on Recommendation 6 at
the next meeting of the CCWG on Tuesday February 9 12:00UTC.
To facilitate your consideration of this prior to that meeting we are
attaching two documents to this email:
- The first is a list of Recommendation 6 from the Third Draft, the
current language accepted for the supplemental report and the Board
compromise language. It also includes a red line of the supplemental
language vs the Board compromise. Finally it analyses the changes of the
supplemental language vs the Board compromise.
- The second is a draft of Recommendation 6, as finalized for the
supplemental report, with a red line of the changes needed to include the
Board compromise.
Thanking you in advance for your understanding and spirit of
compromise we look forward to any comments you might have on the proposed
way forward.
Best regards,
León, Thomas and Mathieu