·         The decision is taken by at least 4 SOs and/or ACs  including at list 1 SO and 1 AC.

·         All the directors have the same treatment (selected by their constituencies or by the nomcom)

·         The SOs and ACs and the NomCom select the board directors and their interim simultaneously (the GNSO selects 2 acting directors and 2 interim ones and the ALAC selects 1 acting director and 1 interim one, etc.). 

·         All acting directors sign before taking their position as Board Director a commitment to step down in case a community decision to recall them is taken 

·         Those interim directors will fully replace the removed directors if the number of recalled directors is less than 8. In case the number reaches 8 or more, the resulting board (non recalled directors plus the interim of the recalled ones) will act as a caretaker till the selection of new directors to replace the recalled ones. 

·         This is to replace the 2 powers: stilling the whole board and recalling individual board directors.   

This has the merit to; 

·         Fulfill the requirement of having the power to remove the whole Board and to remove individual board members

·         make the change smaller and simpler by having a single mechanism to recall the board directors instead of 2

·         not having to find a way for the nomcom to remove their appointed directors

·         avoid a period where ICANN run without board in place

·         avoid the risk of having an SO or AC recalling their selected director because of the SO or AC interest and not the global public interest