Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 9:39 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
Cc: accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The Road to Dublin....
Dear All,
We have to review our proposal and issue a compromised version for the new Public comment.
I am sure the community would support the Board Position
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Sep 2015, at 01:49, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
Hello Becky,
>> I agree but we need to keep in mind that the CCWG cannot speak unilaterally for the community. To the extent we move off the (substantial) portion of the draft proposal that has consensus support, and to the extent we introduce new solutions in those areas where consensus may not be fully formed, we must go back to the community. The Board needs to understand and respect that.
Thanks – we have also discussed this and agree.
One approach I guess could be to put out specific sections that have substantial updates for comment.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community