Eberhard has a point. 

There are legitimate reasons for staff to want to not answer some questions - some personnel issues should remain confidential, some security issues should have disclosure delayed until the problem has been fixed or mitigated, etc. 
The Ombudsman should have access to any internal document, and the discretion and training to decide what is reasonable to release. Why would a strengthened ombudsman not be a good fit for this role?

Regards 
David

(my first post to CCWG Accountability - hi everybody)

On 16 Jul 2015, at 2:03 pm, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <epilisse@gmail.com> wrote:

Cool, another Ombudsman.

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5s


On Jul 16, 2015, at 04:05, Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com> wrote:

How about an independent inspector general?

 

[...]
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community