I know that the Annex 11 is on for discussion today.  Is it just me or does it seem to others near impossible to reach a conclusion on Annex 11 without the GAC’s input?  Even if, in the end, we wind up not accepting their position I would have thought it essential to do so knowing what that position is.

Or is it the case that we are going to drive ahead and just proceed without the GAC because they can’t meet our timeline of consideration?

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig

paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066

Link to my PGP Key

From: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía [mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 8:15 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Cc: ACCT-Staff <acct-staff@icann.org>
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: GAC views on draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of the CCWG-accountability

Dear all,

I am forwarding the GAC’s views on the draft recommendations of our third draft proposal.

Best regards,

León

Inicio del mensaje reenviado:

De: <Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch>

Asunto: GAC views on draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of the CCWG-accountability

Fecha: 25 de enero de 2016, 6:50:14 p.m. GMT-6

Para: <thomas@rickert.net>, <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>, <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>

Cc: <gac@icann.org>

Dear Co-Chairs

Please find attached the GAC’s views on the draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of the CCWG Accountability.

Best regards

Thomas

Thomas Schneider

Chair

ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)