"...let's just go back to the drawing board and start over shall we?"

And if that message were being sent strongly by the CCWG chartering organizations, then perhaps it is exactly what we should do.

But the official voices of those organizations are not the ones that I am largely hearing here.

Alan

At 21/02/2016 11:07 AM, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:

I agree completely with Eberhard (except for his personal characterization of the Co-Chairs). But he is completely right that having declared a Consensus for the Co-Chairs to now allow this matter to be reopened is not good management.

For myself, if we are going to reopen previously agreed consensus, I will push to reopen the following:

1)      Change from Single Member to Single Designator
2)      GAC advice gets a 60% threshold
3)      ACs allowed in the Empowered Community at all

All of those are things that I’m unhappy with. So if the Board gets to intervene at the last minute and reopen this (thus destroying the timeline), let’s just go back to the drawing board and start over shall we?

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739