Dear Rosemary,
Dear Leon
Dear All,
Before certifying question to be 
studied , one need to verify the 
practicality and workability of the 
study.
Issue 1 
How many PICs have been 
received? Perhaps some 500
Issue 2
How many were expected 
to have been received? Perhaps
About 1930, equal to the No. 
 of strings gTLDs
Issue 3
How many supplementary PICs
Were submitted by applicants? No 
Real statistics
Issue 4
Are there any typical or some 
typical PIC or PICs available?
Issue 5
What the meaning of term 
"typical PIC "in legal language?
Issue 6
Does a typical PIC, if any, could
cover the objectives of PIC in 
general legal terms?
I think we are hijacked by a 
question raised which would be 
Impractical to study and impractical
 to infer ant thing from that.
Now, should we not DROP the 
Question?
Regards
Kavouss
 

  

 

Sent from my iPhone

On 12 Dec 2015, at 00:50, Rosemary E. Fei <rfei@adlercolvin.com> wrote:

How large is the universe of existing PICs?  Perhaps someone on the CCWG could provide us with a representative sampling of existing PICs, and we can then review them and draw our own conclusions about what’s a “typical” provision?

 

Rosemary

 

Rosemary E. Fei
Adler & Colvin
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1220
San Francisco, CA 94104
415/421-7555 (phone)
415/421-0712 (fax)
rfei@adlercolvin.com
www.adlercolvin.com

 

_____________________________

Adler & Colvin is a San Francisco Green Business certified by the City and County of San Francisco. Please consider the environment before you print this email.

 

From: Malcolm Hutty [mailto:malcolm@linx.net]
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:34 PM
To: Holly Gregory
Cc: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org); Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Resolution of Mission Language related to regulation and contract

 

 


On 11 Dec 2015, at 22:15, Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory@sidley.com> wrote:

We will need information on the kind of provisions that PICs have typically included.  Could ICANN legal provide that information to us?

 

And therein lies the rub.

 

I think CCWG members are likely to have differing views as to what should be considered "typical" and what aberrant. Nor would I consider ICANN legal a neutral advisor to you on this, if it were making any kind of qualitative judgement. 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community