Thanks Becky,

Some questions for consideration, apologies if these have already been considered by the group:

1. Would panel decisions have precedential value?

2. What would happen if timeframe requirements were not met?

3. How are third parties considered, and conversely, would emergency relief proceedings be required to stay a decision or process?

4. Could an expedited process exist (the ICDR rules currently provide for this)?

5. Would a pre-mediation process be advised/required (e.g. CEP and/or as outlined in the ICDR rules)?

6. What summary dismissal provisions exist and when could these be invoked?

Best, Jacob

Jacob Malthouse

Co-founder & Director, Big Room Inc.

778-960-6527

http://www.bigroom.ca/

On 20 March 2015 at 08:42, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz> wrote:

Dear CCWG-ACCT -

I’ve attached a draft accountability mechanism template for a revised/enhanced Independent Review. Many thanks to those on the Independent Review working group who put this together! You will notice that the template includes lots of questions and alternatives to be discussed in Istanbul.

Best,

Becky

J. Beckwith Burr

Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer

1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006

Office: + 1.202.533.2932 Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / becky.burr@neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community