Not at all. I was thinking more about the idea say of paying for broadband expansion. Which is something I would fully support but that ICANN should not be in the business of. There are many good things I want someone to do, just not ICANN. And then there are bad things I want no one to do. Very different as you say substantively but both out of scope in my view.

--
Paul Rosenzweig
Sent from myMail app for Android

Thursday, 07 January 2016, 06:21PM -05:00 from Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>:

On 07-Jan-16 17:44, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:

> I think it is both manifest and self-evident that if GAC advice were
> to, hypothetically, be that the Board should engage in some activity
> that was beyond its mission(say capacity building or content censorship)

Remarkable to see those two as having the same weight.

Is training people on the DNS or DNSEC in the same category as content
censorship?

avri

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community