-
Failed thus far to develop binding accountability mechanisms.
-
Failed to adhere to policies around publication of documents prior to meetings.
-
Failed to prevent decision making prior to termination of comment periods.
-
Developed no standard for review during the previous attempt at accountability reform (2006?)
-
Failed to develop public metrics to hold ICANN institutions to account (such as contract compliance)
-
Failed to listen to community consensus on singular/plural and controlled the outcome of the redress mechanisms through overly narrow mandate.
-
Pushed ahead with new gTLD program despite a lack of operational readiness, again without consequences.
-
Launched a staff lead review of the new gTLD program prior to any input from the community.
-
Scheduled new round of applications (at least initially) prior to scheduled reviews.
-
Failed to reign in the Net Mundial initiative despite community objection or specify any consequences for secret board resolutions, etc.
-
Accepted the GC advice to protect the corporation instead of the public interest.
-
Weakened rather than strengthened the IRP.
-
Allowed staff to unilaterally change community agreement on registry agreements and imposed the unilateral right to amend registry agreements.
-
Failed to implement half of the ATRT1 recommendations, again without consequences.
-
Supported the practice of passing off all responsibility to third parties so ICANN has no risk. (.SUCKS is the latest example)
-
First attempted to prevent an accountability component to the IANA transition and then tried to control it, insert experts, etc. rather than trusting the community to organize itself.
Just a few thoughts off the top of my head. Your turn.