Dear All,
I hesitate to comment on the letter sent butĀ  looking at the messages exchanged, I wish to briefly comment in an individual capacity ( A CCWG participant only ) as follows
1. The analysis made by the authors of the letter were made with some degree of partiality and with lack of full understanding of the process .
2. As for the issue of "DNS Property" the attention of the authors are drawn to the fact that , DNS likeĀ  ORIBITAL/ SPECTRUM RESOURCES are natural resources and does not belong to anybody. It can be used by any applicant under certain Rule and procedure .Therefore there is no ownership on DNS at all.
It is evident that the internet has been mostly initiated by and from a given country but it does not mean that such country is the owner of the DNS. While It belongs to no body, it belongs to everybody.
The inventor of the electromagnetic waves and the countries in which the issue was developed has never ever claimed to be the owner of the spectrum .
Kavouss

2016-05-22 13:35 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>:
I'm content to discuss it here - I was merely offering to take the discussion aside in case it was seen as off-topic (which is isn't, IMO, that much).



On 22/05/16 11:36, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
on Act.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community