Hi,

How does the bottom-up imperative for SO/AC figure into the drive for standardization? Each of the SOC/AC is diffeent according to its own bottom-up priorities, why wouldn't their legal persona also be self directed?

And if the legal persona can be constrained, is this done as an ICANN Board issue or a Members issue.

avri

On 29-Apr-15 21:06, Jordan Carter wrote:

Hi all,

On 30 April 2015 at 12:44, Chris Disspain <ceo@auda.org.au> wrote:

León,

Thanks!

I appreciate that each SO/AC could set its own controls over its ‘alter ego’ and so the question would be more how will any control mechanisms be enforced.

However, I imagine that it may also be important to each SO/AC to ensure that their fellow SOs and ACs have robust control mechanisms in place.

I strongly agree with this. I think there should be common requirements across the SOs/ACs so we don't end up with a hodge podge or low standards for exercising some of these powers.

What do others think?

J

--

Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com