For some of us, flying is not the important part of an ICANN Meeting.

el

On 2015-10-13 11:55, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Hello People,
>
> There is no violation of process here, lets be realistic, its
> important to interact with the community as much as possible in
> Dublin and if the Co-Chairs have been able to get some more time
> slots through their interactions with the rightful owners of the
> spaces (SO/AC leaders), I think it should be a good news for us.
> Noting in the normal agenda of the CCWG has changed, in that the
> long f2f meeting still holds on Friday and the other slots does
> not extend beyond the normal ICANN meeting days so i don't see how
> that affects anyone getting on plane.
>
> I don't think its within the CCWG's charter to secure normal SO/AC
> time-slots without consulting with them first.  Now that the
> consultation has happened its left to this group to decide whether
> they don't want it or not.
>
> Regards
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net
> <mailto:nigel@channelisles.net>> wrote:
>
>     Colleagues
>
>     I strongly object to this behind-the-scenes way of working.
>
>     Can you please list (a) the "AC/SO leaders" and the powers
>     they have in the Charter to do this.
>
>     This appears to be to be DELIBERATELY exclusionary.  Many of
>     us participatns have already got committments for most of this
>     five day long meeting.
>
>     It is ENTIRELY UNACCEPTABLE to make such a decision as people
>     are already getting on aeroplanes.
>
>     I wish to invoke the Reconsideration procedure, please.
>
>
[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el@lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community