I&#39;m very supportive of efforts to explore and define GPI within ICANN&#39;s remit. I hope to be involved in those efforts, which could be significant (at least in level of effort).<div><br></div><div>But it should not be a <span></span>factor in our discussions of the Board&#39;s comments on the the Third Draft Proposal. We are not going to achieve a breakthrough with the Board because we have The Definition of Global Public Interest.<div><br></div><div>With regard to our work right now, this is a red herring.<br><br>On Saturday, December 26, 2015, Avri Doria &lt;<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
On 26-Dec-15 15:58, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:<br>
&gt; Are you suggesting that the PI of all nations are identical?<br>
<br>
No.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.<br>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org&#39;)">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>