Indeed. Thanks to both and I am pretty sure that the ALAC would support this.

Although this is not a Seven-Per-Cent Solution, it may well be the only answer left once we have eliminated all the others! *

Alan

* If you don't understand that comment, either ignore it or see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seven-Per-Cent_Solution and http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/83.html.

At 31/01/2016 07:30 PM, Drazek, Keith wrote:

Thanks to Kavouss for this suggestion, and to Greg for highlighting it. I hope we can all consider this as a possible further compromise solution that might bring us to resolution. I know we are all committed to the successful completion of our work in a timely manner. Let's not miss this opportunity to reach consensus and finish our work in a collaborative manner.

Regards to all.
Keith

On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com > wrote:

All,

I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.

Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold between Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.

Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way out of the current situation. It is a literally a middle ground between the current majority threshold and the previously proposed 2/3 threshold: