It's not just the Board; it was clear to me from Larry's remarks that the
NTIA will not buy into a member model either. And if they aren't buying
into it, it will not happen.

Cheers.
Stephen Deerhake

-----Original Message-----
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of
Malcolm Hutty
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 12:16 PM
To: Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net>;
accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Communications Ideas

On 27/09/2015 15:48, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> Unless the community give up the idea of ICANN having members (whether
> one or seven billion) the Board will not agree a common proposal.

I wish I had been able to attend the face-to-face meeting.

Were the Board able to be any more clear as to why they insist on the
community giving up on the idea of having at least a single member?

--
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London
Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
           21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community