Well I would have disagreed as well if I was the only one who makes the decision. The fact that it's the proposal that achieved the community consensus for onward forwarding, makes it the best we could get as a community.

Nevertheless, perhaps when we have a different generation of community members, maybe they would reason things differently and produce a different result but I won't put my money on the current community irrespective of how much more time we spend on this. At best we generate more processes, committees and perhaps more acronyms as well, and ofcourse more registrants money being spent.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 24 May 2016 11:22 p.m., "Sivasubramanian M" <isolatedn@gmail.com> wrote:
​Dear Seun,​

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:

that is the best we could get as a community

​I disagree.

Sivasubramanian M​
 

 




--