Hello all,

The recordings and transcripts for the WP1 Meeting #20 held on 22 July will be available here:

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Kim

Action Items

Action: produce text on voting weights and influence for the mechanism before Friday

Action: Grace and Steve to work on incorporating text on page 3 as it relates to stress test

Action: include petitioning period in Bylaws

Action: Steve to propose an updated draft (will write up a 2-step disclosure process)

Action: remove bracketed text on page 1

Action: drafting to be clear that any standards would be advisory only

Action: CCWG to discuss paragraph 11

Action (Jordan): clean up document and recirculate for discussion next week.

Action: include header either here or in community powers sections

Action: Jordan to have discussion with Steve, Chairs, and staff to get a clear statement as soon as possible to the full CCWG list

Action: please send your suggestions ASAP on any additional work to do

Action: Jordan to circulate draft agenda

Notes

1. Community Model

· Edit Page 2: "It provides greather legal enforceability than the Empowered So/AC model"

· Edit Page 2: change "given" to "given that"

· Whenever referring to a decision maker, we need to refer to the right one

· IGNORE text on "influence in the community mechanism" --> was not intended for distribution and needed further information on how the voting weights work.

Action: produce text on voting weights and influence for the mechanism before Friday

2. Fundamental Bylaws

· merged sections 3.2. and 5.4

· CWG dependencies included on page 2

Action: Grace and Steve to work on incorporating text on page 3 as it relates to stress test

3. Standard Bylaws

· Community should be able to provide feedback in comment period as well as review period. Is a review period of 2 weeks enough?

Action: include petitioning period in Bylaws

4. AOC Reviews into the ICANN Bylaws

· NDA text needs to be developed

· Edit: change review team to "review teams or a subset thereof" to be aware of the fact that some review teams do not want to be fully involved in these disclosures.

· Suggested text from James Gannon: "A confindential disclosure framework shall be published by ICANN. The confidential dosclusre framework shall describe the process by which a review team may request acccess to and the process for classification of documentation. The CDA will provide a mechanism of escalation for relese of documentation to duly authorised review teams"

Action: Steve to propose an updated draft (will write up a 2-step disclosure process)

5. Removal of Individual Directors

· Poll on page 1: ticks to delete the bracketed text

· Ticks: 12; Crosses: 0; (Total participants: 21 (6 of whom were staff/counsel who were not eligible for vote))

Action: remove bracketed text on page 1

Action: drafting to be clear that any standards would be advisory only

Action: CCWG to discuss paragraph 11

6. Recall of the entire ICANN Board

· Lawyers provided a redline review of this document -- possible that there is too much detail

· Question: is everyone ok with this document or do you need more time?

· Ticks: 4 = ok with doc

· Crosses: 5 = need more time

Action (Jordan): clean up document and recirculate for discussion next week.

7. ICANN Budget

Action: include header either here or in community powers sections

Action: Jordan to have discussion with Steve, Chairs, and staff to get a clear statement as soon as possible to the full CCWG list

8. Identification of any other bits of work we need to do to wrap this up

Action: please send your suggestions ASAP on any additional work to do

9. Agree Agenda outline for meeting #21.

Action: Jordan to circulate draft agenda