On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CCWG ACCT Session 10 call on 03 February will be available here https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51415000

Action Items

- Upload/update your SOI using the wiki 

- Encourage your communities to attend the engagement session

- Staff to post updated list of sessions on wiki 

- Rapporteurs to confirm availability to join Chairs during engagement session

- Staff to assemble number of sessions where engagement with communities will take place

- Working Parties to send meeting requirements (if any) as soon as possible 

- Co-chairs to ask for Board expectations and to coordinate with Bruce Tonkin (Board liaison) 

- Circulate proposed agenda to list

- Read compilation of documents/information in preparation for Singapore sessions and identify any gaps 

- Robin to send synopsis of a Bylaws mechanism

- WP2 is trying to organize its first call/meeting - a doodle poll will be circulated.

- ST-WP to provide draft examples in anticipation of Singapore discussions to understand what is meant by stress tests and collect feedback

- Be prepared for Singapore (agenda, invitations) 

- Read all documents

- Keep respective groups informed of progress

- Continue debates on mailing list 

Notes

1. Welcome & roll call & SOI 

- SOIs are still missing. 

Action item

- Upload/update your SOI using the wiki 

 

2. Update from interactions with CWG 

- Response to CWG has been circulated. CCWG is now expecting feedback. 

- CCWG-CWG leadership discussed how the groups may align thinking in terms of timeline, overall plan. 

- CWG will issue a progress report in anticipation of Singapore

3. Preparing Singapore 

     a. Reminder of sessions / logistics

- Remote participation is available for all sessions

- Rapporteurs: join Co-chairs on stage during engagement session 

- Thursday session will be also used to recap various messages received during week 

Action Items

- Encourage your communities to attend the engagement session

- Staff to post updated list of sessions on wiki 

- Rapporteurs to confirm availability to join Chairs during engagement session

- Staff to assemble number of sessions where engagement with communities will take place

- Working Parties to send meeting requirements (if any) as soon as possible 

     b. Agenda /topics for Board meeting 

- Topics for session with Board include: timeline; how CCWG proposal will be handled, any anticipated reasons why a proposal/part of a proposal might be refused, and the anticipated process following any such refusal; update on two WPs (communication empowerment - Review & Redress)

- Meeting with the Board will be posted on the meeting schedule along with remote participation details. 

Action Item

- Co-chairs to ask for Board expectations and to coordinate with Bruce Tonkin (Board liaison) 

- Circulate proposed agenda to list   

      c. Review of engagement material provided before meeting 

Action Item

- Read compilation of documents/information in preparation for Singapore sessions and identify any gaps 

4. Update WP1/WP2 

       a. By rapporteurs 

- WP1 has begun analyzing the mindmap and collecting requirements of inventory against identified mindmap requirements. 

- 4 suggestions for structures that would empower the community were catalogued: 1) ad hoc SO/AC; 2) permanent community WG; 3) statutory members; 4)Supervisory Board

- Initial draft will be shared in advance of Singapore

- The WP is looking into scheduling a call to discuss modus operandi and establish a calendar of work. The WP indicated that an end date on WP work would be useful. End of March 2015 was flagged as the expected delivery date. 

Action item

- Robin to send synopsis of a Bylaws mechanism

- WP2 is trying to organize its first call/meeting - a doodle poll will be circulated.

    b. Update stress test WP 

- The wiki page captures the 25 contingencies merged into 5 different groups. A table serves to track where contingencies are. ST-WP will potentially hold a meeting in Singapore. 

- Proposal to run stress tests against mechanisms - determine whether prevent consequences of stress test or mitigate/react

   c. Ideally, discussion around first set of answers to the contingency questions 

- Proposal is to start with stress tests and determine how the existing mechanism reacts and how envisioned mechanism would react. 

- Suggestions of a gap analysis approach and an Exist & sufficient - Exist & insufficient approach were made.

Action Item

- ST-WP to provide draft examples in anticipation of Singapore discussions to understand what is meant by stress tests and collect feedback

5. Legal advice update

- The task force has started building questions that should be asked to legal experts and awaiting questions from working parties.

- A shortlist was requested from CWG (awaiting reply); the group is coordinating with CWG on California law restrictions. 

- Outcome will be shared with the group as soon as received. 

-The CCWG welcomed advisor Lee Bygrave.

6. A.O.B

The following desired outcomes  for Singapore were identified:

·       Share advancement of work (WPs, requirements, contingencies

·       Ensure we receive feedback from community, assess, adjust (as needed)

·       Ensure timelines are appropriately synchronized (including with ICANN Board) 

·       Make substantive progress during two work sessions 

·       Ensure we are aligned with community's thinking

7. Closing Remarks 

Action Items:

- Be prepared for Singapore (agenda, invitations) 

- Read all documents

- Keep respective groups informed of progress

- Continue debates on mailing list 

 


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community




--
Sincerely
CARRIE Devorah
562 688 2883

 

DISCLAIMER :
With the continuing crossing and interfacing of platforms both on & off line both with & without our knowledge nor approval to note nothing sent over the Internet anymore is ever private nor should be presumed to be so. If it is that much of a secret, say nothing. If you must? Take a lesson from our military- hand write the note, chew then swallow