From: <
accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "James M. Bladel"
Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 9:10 AM
To: Matthew Shears, Kavouss Arasteh, Malcolm Hutty, Mathieu Weill, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía, Thomas Rickert
Cc: CCWG Accountability
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Perhaps a variation...
Agree with Jordan, Kavouss, Malcolm, and others.
CMSM was not the ideal, but provides the bare minimum in terms of enforceability. I do not support re-opening the exploration of alternative models.
Thanks—
J.
I share the same concerns expressed by Jordan, Malcolm and Kavouss.
Matthew
On 9/2/2015 11:49 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear Alan,
I wholeheartedly support Jordan
We can not reconsider what we were about to finalize from our Paris Meeting and start a new round of discussion just 10 days before the expiry of Deadline.
I do not think that what Alan proposed is simpler as there is bnot clear criteria to examine its simplicity.
I am not in favor of the continuation of the discussion in this regard.
As Keith Drazak told in Chat, CMSM is a compromise even if I did not agree to use the term "compromise "as it is the only way that all six?Seven powers could be exercised by the community
Legal Advisers have comprehensively described the problem of Designator, unless it is accompanied by the UA approach that we have totally abandoned
Regards
Kavouss
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987