Even if we agree with these distinctions (which
I dont though), any State would not ask you what kind of
jurisdiction you admit and which not. That is the whole point of
state's sovereignty. So the main issue is, what is the plan for
those kinds of 'interferences' you are not ready to admit. Please
spell out what is going to be done as these non-admissible
interferences become imminent. Or is the plan to wait till one
happens and then think about what to do?
parminder
On Friday 24 June 2016 09:31 PM, Carlos
Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
PC I don’t think it should include private
litigation brought against ICANN and heard in state or federal
court;
MM: agree
PC or law enforcement actions
MM: that depends. Antitrust could be ok but I could think of
other LEA actions that might constitute interference
Agree with MM
PC or criminal charges against an ICANN employee for
embezzlement, etc.
MM: of course.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community