Dear Kavouss,

In light of the comments received, our group needs to decide how to respond to the various topics. As you rightly point out, some items we might not be able to address in WS1, maybe not even in WS2. But we need to discuss it as a group and that is the point of lauching the discussion.

Best
Mathieu

Le 22/06/2015 21:05, Kavouss Arasteh a écrit :
Mathieu
I wonder whether some of these issue is implementable?
For instance GAC is composed of representatives of Governments. Each member of GAC ,in person, is accountable to his or her Government .
In other area I suspect whether or not you intend to open a Pandora Box?
Staff are accountable to Board and CEO we could not make staff accoiuntable to the community since we break the chain of hierarchy
I do not know what we are doing
Do you have months of time and tens of Calls and and ...
Not all comments could be implementable.
Pls review the topics
We need to merely address the those items which are valid ,in particular, how to implement the empowerment and enforcement and few other things
Kavouss 
  

2015-06-23 0:11 GMT+02:00 Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack@gmail.com>:
Hi Mathieu,

Many thanks for your email and the one pagers. I have glanced through
the documents and noticed the need for a governance framework (in
broad terms) that satisfies the needs of  the evolving  ICANN
community. It would be interesting to look at some ideas that are
acceptable under the Californian Law from those familiar with the
jurisdiction.

Regards

On 6/22/15, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> As discussed last friday when we reviewed the public comments, some of
> the feedback we have received require us to consider whether and how we
> should address several topics :
> - staff accountability culture
> - Board duties and roles
> - enhancing diversity
> - enhancing SO/AC accountability
>
> In order to kick start discussions on these topics, we have assembled
> one pagers attempting to describe each issue (based essentially on
> comments we have received) as well some of the potential actions that
> were suggested. Please note that these are discussion papers and in no
> way reflect any "position" on the matters.
>
> It is anticipated that we could have initial discussions on these topics
> In our upcoming work sessions. But this mailing list is also an
> appropriate place to share your reflections on these matters, as I noted
> Jordan already did on another thread.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Mathieu WEILL
>
>


--
Barrack O. Otieno
+254721325277
+254-20-2498789
Skype: barrack.otieno
http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


-- 
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill@afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************