Even if we agree with these distinctions (which I dont though), any State would not ask you what kind of jurisdiction you admit and which not. That is the whole point of state's sovereignty. So the main issue is, what is the plan for those kinds of 'interferences' you are not ready to admit. Please spell out what is going to be done as these non-admissible interferences become imminent. Or is the plan to wait till one happens and then think about what to do?

parminder

On Friday 24 June 2016 09:31 PM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:

PC I don’t think it should include private litigation brought against ICANN and heard in state or federal court;

MM: agree

PC or law enforcement actions

MM: that depends. Antitrust could be ok but I could think of other LEA actions that might constitute interference

Agree with MM

PC or criminal charges against an ICANN employee for embezzlement, etc.

MM: of course.

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community