Transcriptions are the most reliable documentation of what was said and agreed to. Human memory is notoriously faulty. 

The fact that WS 2 items did not require pre-transition action does not lessen their importance.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey
From:mshears@cdt.org
Sent:May 30, 2016 12:29 PM
To:avri@apc.org; accountability-cross-community@icann.org
Subject:Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - WS2 Presentation for meeting tomorrow - Minor corrections

+ 1


On 5/30/2016 5:17 PM, avri doria wrote:
Hi,

I would like to question the non transcription decision.

Especially in the case where the participants are responsible for both
participating and making sure all discussed issues are included, the
transcription is important.  It also helps those for whom English is not
a first language, who read better than they parse peoples varying
accents and pronunciations.

avri


On 30-May-16 11:46, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
All,

Minor corrections to the slides on WS2 attached.

B.


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 

Matthew Shears | Director, Global Internet Policy & Human Rights Project
Center for Democracy & Technology | cdt.org
E: mshears@cdt.org | T: +44.771.247.2987