+1
Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 17:14, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr@neustar.biz> wrote:
>
> My view is that the Board’s position is reasonable where an IRP is available, and unreasonable in those situations – perhaps highly unusual but nonetheless conceivable – where the grounds for recall do not rest on an allegation that it has violated the Bylaws/Articles.