Can staff go back and look at the history of this (in both published and internal versions)?
This may be a case where the rule "assume nothing" should apply.
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015, Malcolm Hutty <
malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
On 08/12/2015 14:40, David Post wrote:
> I think we're all in agreement that it's the openness, stabiity, etc. of
> the DNS. So we should say that directly, adding the words "of the DNS"
> at the end.
Are we?
The NTIA transition requirements specify the need to maintain the
"security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS" but the
"openness of the Internet."
--
Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
London Internet Exchange Ltd
Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
Company Registered in England No. 3137929
Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community