To ensure full transparency
around the polling, the staff have reviewed the recording for the call and
crosschecked the results. The Adobe Connect recording is available here for
your viewing as well: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p2ner13u4kd/.
Please note that the
instructions regarding participation in the polls were as follows:
·
Anyone on the
call was invited to participate in the poll (members & participants).
·
To participate, participants
in the Adobe Connect room used either a red or green tick to respond to the
poll question.
·
Those on
audio-only could express their position over the phone.
·
After the polls,
analysis would be conducted to assess participation from CCWG members (for the
purposes of these results, the members’ names are in bold font).
The Chairs conducted four
polls in a group that varied between 85-90 participants. The text used as the
basis for the polls is Paragraph 72 of the CCWG report (see attached slide for
the text as well as the 2nd bullet highlighted in red). The first
two poll questions were based on objections and the second two poll questions
were based on expressions of support.
Summary of results:
·
11 objections to
removing the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red on the slide)
o
(2 CCWG member
objections)
·
27 objections to
sending the report forward as it is currently, with the full text in Paragraph
72
o
(8 CCWG member
objections, including all ALAC members)
·
36 support
removing the language in the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red on
the slide)
o
(10 CCWG members
supporting)
·
14 support
sending the report forward as it is currently, with the full text in Paragraph
72
o
(2 CCWG members
supporting)
Detailed results:
Poll #1 –
Who objects to removing the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red on
the slide), (“If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board action in
question”)?
1. Brett Schaefer (NCSG – Participant)
2. Edward Morris (NCSG – Participant)
3. Farzaneh Badii (NCSG – Participant)
4. James Gannon (NCSG – Participant)
5. Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP – Participant)
6. Milton Mueller (NCSG – Participant)
7. Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG – Participant)
8. Robin Gross (NCSG – Member)
9. Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
10. Tatiana Tropina (NCSG – Participant)
11. Eberhard
Lisse (ccNSO – Member)
Poll #2 –
Who objects to sending the report forward (to Chartering Organizations) as it
is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in Paragraph
72)?
1. Alan
Greenberg (ALAC – Member)
2. Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board – Participant)
3. Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board – Participant)
4. Cheryl
Langdon-Orr (ALAC – Member)
5. Chris Disspain (ICANN Board – Participant)
6. David McAuley (GNSO – Participant)
7. Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board – Participant)
8. George Sadowsky (ICANN Board – Participant)
9. Jorge Cancio (GAC – Participant)
10. Julia
Wolman (GAC – Member)
11. Keith Drazek (RySG – Participant)
12. Leon
Sanchez (ALAC – Member)
13. Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board – Participant)
14. Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board – Participant)
15. Markus Kummer (ICANN Board – Participant)
16. Olga
Cavalli (GAC – Member)
17. Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC – Participant)
18. Pedro da Silva (GAC – Participant)
19. Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC – Participant)
20. Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board – Participant)
21. Roelof
Meijer (ccNSO – Member)
22. Ron da Silva (ICANN Board – Participant)
23. Samantha Eisner (ICANN Staff Liaison)
24. Seun Ojedeji (ALAC – Participant)
25. Steve Crocker (ICANN Board – Participant)
26. Sebastien
Bachollet (ALAC – Member)
27. Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
28. Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff – Participant)
29. Tijani Ben
Jemaa (ALAC – Member)
Poll #3 –
Who supports removing the language in the 2nd bullet in Paragraph 72
(in red on the slide), (“If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board
action in question”)?
1. Alan Greenberg
(ALAC – Member)
2. Annaliese Williams (GAC – Participant)
3. Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board – Participant)
4. Avri Doria (NCSG – Participant)
5. Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board – Participant)
6. Cheryl
Langdon-Orr (ALAC – Member)
7. Chris Disspain (ICANN Board – Participant)
8. David McAuley (GNSO – Participant)
9. Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board – Participant)
10. Finn Petersen (GAC – Participant)
11. George Sadowsky (ICANN Board – Participant)
12. Greg Shatan (IPC – Participant)
13. James
Bladel (RrSG – Member)
14. Julia Wolman
(GAC – Member)
15. Kavouss Arasteh (GAC – Participant)
16. Keith Drazek (RySG – Participant)
17. Leon Sanchez
(ALAC – Member)
18. Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board – Participant)
19. Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board – Participant)
20. Mark Carvell (GAC – Participant)
21. Markus Kummer (ICANN Board – Participant)
22. Mary Uduma (ccNSO – Participant)
23. Niels Ten Oever (Participant)
30. Olga Cavalli
(GAC – Member)
24. Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC – Participant)
25. Paul Szyndler (ccNSO – Participant)
26. Pedro da Silva (GAC – Participant)
31. Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC – Participant)
27. Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board – Participant)
28. Roelof Meijer
(ccNSO – Member)
29. Ron da Silva (ICANN Board – Participant)
30. Sabine Meyer (GAC – Participant)
31. Seun Ojedeji (ALAC – Participant)
32. Steve Crocker (ICANN Board – Participant)
33. Steve
DelBianco (CSG – Member)
34. Sebastien Bachollet
(ALAC – Member)
35. Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff)
36. Tijani Ben Jemaa
(ALAC – Member)
Poll #4 –
Who supports sending the report to Chartering Organizations as it is currently,
(i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in Paragraph 72)?
1. Aarti Bhavana (NCSG – Participant)
2. Brett Schaefer (NCSG – Participant)
3. Edward Morris (NCSG – Participant)
4. Farzaneh Badii (NCSG – Participant)
5. James Gannon (NCSG – Participant)
6. Jordan
Carter (ccNSO – Member)
7. Martin Boyle (ccNSO – Participant)
8. Matthew Shears (NCSG – Participant)
9. Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP – Participant)
10. Milton Mueller (NCSG – Participant)
11. Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG – Participant)
12. Robin Gross
(NCSG – Member)
13. Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
14. Tatiana Tropina (NCSG – Participant)