Yes but there have been many such examples already e.g. Melton 5 minutes ago.  We are already in the drafting.  So this seems a bit retrograde mo?

--
Paul
Sent from myMail app for Android

Saturday, 21 November 2015, 05:13PM -06:00 from Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>:

Hello Paul,

>>   I read the concerns about the restriction clause as suggesting that it be deleted (perhaps I am wrong in this)

No- we didn’t say that a restriction clause should be deleted.

We said:

" The Board asks that the CCWG provide some examples of what the
CCWG believes that ICANN should and should not be able to do.
That information can then be provided to counsel to see if text can be
drafted to address the broader concerns."


Regards,
Bruce Tonkin


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community