I would like to support this request.  I find it troubling that comments on the proposal by the CCWG's counsel are not being taken into account.

Matthew

On 12/01/2016 08:03, farzaneh badii wrote:
Dear Co-Chairs, All 

Previously, I requested for a transparent public communication channel which allowed everyone to have access to communication between Staff, Co-chairs and others, especially when drafting the proposal. It was not taken into consideration. No public channel was provided for such communication. This would have prevented alot of speculations. 

Now listening to what CCWG lawyers have to say about not including their comments in the drafts of CCWG proposal (here is the link to lawyers concerns https://community.icann.org/x/15dlAw ) which might be just due to a total oversight, I was wondering if I could ask for two things: 

1. Please make a public communication channel for co-chair communication with Staff, communication among staff, and any communication that has an effect on drafting the proposal. 

2. The lawyers in this call stated that some of their comments were requested to be posted,including some that were sent on Sunday, but they have not been. Can you please clarify which comments and why they have not been posted and if it is an oversight I would like to request all their comments that have not been posted to be posted as soon as possible.

Best

--
Farzaneh


_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology 
mshears@cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987 
This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com