Dear all, dear Leon,

The lesson I take from today is that if we follow in the path of the CWG and prepare a long list of questions for legal advice, we are going to get back a) a lot of written material that b) isn't entirely useful.

Some questions that led to an early conversation with the legal advisors, and the ability to refine down to the real nuggets that need further research, might be far more valuable.

Is that something we can work towards?

Hope this helps.

best

Jordan

On 8 February 2015 at 10:18, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:

Dear all,

Please find attached the responses from Jones Day for questions prepared by Kevin Espinola. I would like to ask you to please review the document so we can further discuss it in our session tomorrow.

I would also like to remind the group that this is a first step which runs parallel to what the legal sub-team is doing in coordination with the CWG “legal client”. The aim is to have this responses reviewed by the legal sub-team as well as by the larger CCWG so we can determine how to better validate this responses with the external legal advisors when we engage with said external advice.

I look forward to a fruitful session with all of you.

Best regards,

León

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.