On Sep 12, 2016, at 12:24 AM, avri doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
On 10-Sep-16 09:53, Sam Lanfranco wrote:At that point evidence and logic will hold little sway against media
"sound bites" that may well be completely false
so why aren't we putting out helpful but truthful soundbites?Avri -With respect to the current IANA transition stewardship activities, we willsoon be entering the phase of diminishing media & public influence overthe outcome as the US Congress appropriation folks and party leadersmust come to a Continuing Resolution agreement rather quickly if it is to bepassed in time to avoid a USG shutdown on 1 October 2016. (I do agreewith the generic need for ongoing & consistent media/public/governmentaleducation about our community and its activities, but with respect to thisparticular matter at hand, as it is now in the hands a very small number ofIS congressmen as to whether NTIA will be allowed to continue with theIANA contract transition or if a specific prohibition on transition is added -thus requiring an extension to the IANA contract.There is some clear and highly targeted messaging underway, at the levelappropriate to the audience – one example is this letter of support from anumber of Internet related organizations in the US (thanks to ChristianatI2C for arranging such!) - <http://www.circleid.com/posts/20160912_tech_ >heavyweights_to_congress_ transition_has_our_support/ Note that overall we are in a very challenging period where most of the partiesinvolved (both in favor and opposed to the IANA Stewardship transition) havemuch more immediate priorities when it comes to the overall USG appropriationnegotiation underway, particularly given the upcoming US Presidential election.(this task would have been orders of magnitude less risky if done last year.)/Johnp.s. My views alone.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross- community