Dear Robin,

The key issues for discussion on Rec. #1 are:

1. Discuss further scoping of inspection rights (§19 and beyond) to address Board concerns based on Board suggestion and lawyer memo (details on pages 5-6 of the document sent to the list):

a. Confirm scope and limitations;

b. Discuss thresholds for this new “power”: board suggest 2 for community Forum and 3 SO/ACs; Lawyers suggested 1 SO or AC was sufficient (no community Forum).

2. Confirm or discuss whether GAC is a decisional participant in the Community powers. (Might need to be delayed until we receive formal GAC input)— se comment on page 6 of the document sent to the list.

I hope this clarifies your doubt.
 
Best regards,


León

El 06/01/2016, a las 4:12 p.m., Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> escribió:

Is the Rec. #1 issue of whether GAC should remain in an advisory role only or also add the decision making role of the Community Powers on the agenda for call #75?  The inspection issue isn’t the only issue under discussion on Rec. #1, is it?

Thanks,
Robin



On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:07 AM, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> wrote:

Dear all,

In anticipation of your call#75 – Thursday, 7 January 2016 (19:00 – 22:00 UTC) (time converter), please find below a proposed agenda:

1. Welcome, Roll-Call, SoI (2 min) 
2. Recommendation 1 - Inspection rights (45 min) 
3 Recommendation 2 - Escalation timeframe (45 min) 
Break (10 min)
4. Recommendation 4 - Budget (IANA) (45 min)
5. Recommendation 5 – Mission (45 min) 
Please note that Becky is in the process of preparing the Mission material. It will be circulated as soon as possible. In the meantime we invite you to refer to public comment summary -  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-January/009304.html 
6. AOB (3 min)


Thanks,

Best regards

Alice




_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community