If ICANN were incorporated in Delaware, it would be required to have members, and the whole debate of SMM vs MEM would be moot.

On Friday, October 16, 2015, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:

Well, if there IS a staring contest going on between the Board and the Community to see who will blink first, it seems the Community just woke up to realise that it includes a couple of members possessing the glare of a basilisk . . .


On 16/10/15 00:25, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:

Colleagues

Good morning in Dublin.

The attached letter from Senators Thune and Schatz to the Chair of the
ICANN Board will be of interest to many of you.

I wish you good fortune in the meetings

Regards

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig

paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com
<mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com>

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066

Link to my PGP Key
<http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>



_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community