Dear Kavouss,
At this point, the slides are a discussion starter and we look forward to the group's feedback.
Your message is heard loud and clear, especially on the required openness and transparency.
I would point out that the "coordination" mentioned in the slides is not related in any way to any decision making, but rather on updating about our progress.
Best,
Mathieu
Le 29/09/2015 12:02, Kavouss Arasteh a écrit :
Dear MathieuPls carefully read my earlier message ,I hope you are not acting like your co-chair not listening to the participantsI AM STRONGLY AGAINST CREATING A SMALL CLOSED GROUP to discuss any issue what so ever.The CCWG Chater is quite clear. The community has given a rtasks to us to discuss openly freely and transparently.THE CHARTER THEREFORE DOES NOT SPEAK OF ANY CLOSED GROUP.If the CCWG and not Co-chair reach at a consensus that another group shouléd be formed to discuss the issue Under consideration with a view to find a way forward ,taking into account all inputs ( ccwg second Prooposal , Public Comments, Board,s proposal and the report of LA meeting) that groupm MUST BE OPEN TO EVERY BODY AND WE SHOULD AGREE ON ITS CHAIR OR CO-CHAIR.tHE ICANN process MUST BE OPEN, INCLUSSIVE, TRANSPARENT AND DEMOCRATIC.Pls kindly be careful and advoid creating a hiden/ closed cgroupRegardsKavouss
2015-09-29 11:50 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>:
Dear Robin,
Thank you for your quick feedback. I try to clarify below.
Le 29/09/2015 00:10, Robin Gross a écrit :
Thanks, Mathieu, for this helpful proposal. I've got a couple questions for clarifications about some statements on the slides.This sentence is probably confusing. It might be expressed more clearly in the correspondence to Steve Crocker :
1. On slide 7, the last one, on point 2 it says "Ensure that Board briefings on CCWG are (also) provided by CCWG co-chairs". Does this mean those briefings will be provided to CCWG members via the co-chairs? Or was the "by" meant to be a "to" in that statement (or something else)? It wasn't quite clear to me.
3. At the same time, we reiterate our proposal to provide, as co-chairs, regular Board briefings during the Board meetings dedicated to Accountability, alongside the briefings provided by the President and staff. We would also welcome the opportunity to review the briefing materials received by Board members, and would understand if that was subject to a non disclosure agreement.So it was related to the briefings *of* the Board *by* CCWG.
I hope this clarifies ?
That is a good topic for discussion. At this point, this had been drawn from Ira Magaziner's suggestion to coordinate more closely within the leadership of the various groups.
2. Also on slide 7, point 4 on the substantive work of the sub-teams (sub-part 2) "coordination by new small group (SO/AC reps, Board, Lawyers) to limit friction, no decision-making". Presumably this means the SO/AC reps appointed to CCWG. But which "board" members and which "lawyers" are proposed to coordinate the sub-teams in this new small group?
Best,
Mathieu
Thanks much!
Best,
Robin
On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
In anticipation of a discussion during our meeting tomorrow, please find attached a set of slides to suggest a way forward, for the group's consideration.
Thank you for your feedbacks.
Best regards,
Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
<To Dublin and beyond.pdf>_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill@afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ***************************** Mathieu WEILL AFNIC - directeur général Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06 mathieu.weill@afnic.fr Twitter : @mathieuweill *****************************