hi all, Martin:

On 22 March 2015 at 18:22, Martin Boyle <Martin.Boyle@nominet.org.uk> wrote:

Hi Jordan,
Your comment

>
In the end, between the CWG and the CCWG, we have to deal with the post-contract environment, and we have to have a genuinely multistakeholder solution for the overall oversight of the IANA functions. I don't think a customer-only CSC achieves that, and nor does an IAP - but they are parts of the general accountability puzzle for sure."

worries me.

It seems to imply that we need multi-stakeholder at every level.

I don't think that this is what the NTIA announcement says. Indeed i'd say Customer in CSC has a specific meaning and the CSC should work for customers to ensure good service.

I am sorry that it came across that way because I completely agree with you. I specifically do not think the customer committee has to be the multistakeholder body - my view is that it should be a customer committee.

What I meant was that between CCWG and CWG, we also have to construct the multistakeholder oversight process, that is broader than the customers.

HTH

Jordan

Best

Martin

Sent from my iPhone

> On 22 Mar 2015, at 15:03, Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz> wrote:
>
> In the end, between the CWG and the CCWG, we have to deal with the post-contract environment, and we have to have a genuinely multistakeholder solution for the overall oversight of the IANA functions. I don't think a customer-only CSC achieves that, and nor does an IAP - but they are parts of the general accountability puzzle for sure.

Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet