Dear Robin,
Thank you for your email. We did not have time to address it
during last week's call so, as discussed during the call.
You raised the question of transparency of prep calls and debrief
calls between co chairs and rapporteurs.
We use these coordination calls to establish agendas, discuss
outstanding items, define steps and issues (as needed), map out
project planning and address any immediate questions or issues
Rapporteurs and Cochairs wish to raise.
Mindful of the time it might take for recordings and
transcripts to be available and of the occasional need for
redaction when sensitive matters are raised, e.g. complaints
received from group members, we would like to suggest providing
the group with a short bullet–point summary for future meetings,
as an alternative. We feel a concise approach would enable the
group to see what was discussed "at a glance". This alternative
could also be expanded into summaries, as deemed needed by the
group, with a note that content would be subject to redaction as
indicated above.
We would welcome the wider group's thoughts on the need to have
calls recorded and transcribed. Are there requirements the group
considers our calls should have in order to better serve the
transparency process?
We look forward to reading any additional feedback the group
may have on this.
Thanks
Best regards
Thomas, Leon and Mathieu
Co-chairs
This reminds me of a point I've been meaning to raise. I'd
like to request that the meetings of the co-chairs,
rapportours, and staff be recorded, transcribed, and posted
to the web so we can more easily follow along with the
decision making process in the CCWG. Please note that I do
not make this request because I suspect any sort of improper
behavior at these meetings, but because it would help us to
better understand the big picture decisions and issues that
we are facing. And since we are an accountability group
committed to transparency in our own activities, I would
expect there to be no problem with such a request.
Thank you,
Robin
On Apr 10, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Greg Shatan
wrote:
Counsel:
CCWG
co-chairs now request a pre-meeting with
counsel (relating to the Tuesday presentation)
from 18.30 to 19.00 UTC on Monday, April 13.
(This was moved to avoid conflicts.) Please
let us know if counsel will be available at
that time.
Thanks!
Greg
Gregory S.
Shatan ï Abelman Frayne &
Schwab
Partner | IP | Technology |
Media | Internet
666 Third
Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621
Direct 212-885-9253 | Main 212-949-9022
Fax 212-949-9190 | Cell 917-816-6428
---------- Forwarded
message ----------
From:
Adam Peake
<adam.peake@icann.org>
Date: Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: teleconf: external legal advisors
and CCWG co-chairs
To: Greg Shatan <
gregshatanipc@gmail.com>
Cc: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <
leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>,
Alice Jansen <
alice.jansen@icann.org>
Thanks Greg.
Co-chairs
and their request for 30 mins with
the lawyers on Monday: 18:30 -
19:00 UTC should also be possible for
them, could you ask the lawyers about
that time?
<smime.p7s>_______________________________________________
Ccwg-accountability5 mailing list
Ccwg-accountability5@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability5
--
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill@afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************
_______________________________________________