Thanks Keith,
you are correct.
We should put in the bylaws what is required to achieve our goals.
We should avoid putting redundant language in there as that may cause ambiguity.
Not everything we need to accomplish needs to be put in the bylaws. We should only put into the bylaws what needs to be in the bylaws and put other areas into policies or other documents to abide by.
Thomas
Hi Nigel,I agree, but I took Thomas' comment to mean, 'the fewest bylaws changes necessary to accomplish our goals.' I also agree with that, particularly for WS1.Regards,KeithOn Jul 24, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:>
Why?
That's like saying let's keep legislative changes to the minumum. It MAY be appropriate, but it may not.
It's not an end in itself.
On 07/24/2015 07:44 AM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
.. Let's try to keep bylaw changes to a minimum.
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________Accountability-Cross-Community mailing listAccountability-Cross-Community@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community