Hello,

I agree with the comments made by Olga. 

The positions expressed by Brazil, Argentina and other countries have not been properly captured in this presentation and therefore it does not reflect the whole spectrum of views present in the GAC input document.

Regards,

Pedro    

De: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] em nome de Olga Cavalli [olgacavalli@gmail.com]
Enviado: sexta-feira, 17 de julho de 2015 8:30
Para: Bernard Turcotte
Cc: Accountability Cross Community
Assunto: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Analysis of GAC Comments

Dear Bernard,

Thanks for the summary.

I would like to make some comments and additions to your document:

- Question 2:
There is no reference in the summary about the request from governements that want to have a full balanced participation among all the stakeholders, with equal footing among them.

- Question 3:
There is no reference about the % of governments that want to be fully involved in the CEM (not ONLY  trough liaisons).
Argentina is one of them and there are others.

- Question 4:
There is no reference to % of governments that want to have a different role as only advisory.
Argentina is one of them and there are others.

- Question 5: 
There is no reference to the % of governments that WANT to excercise community powers.
Argentina is one of them and there are others.

As representative of the Government of Argentina, I kindly ask you to include these other views into the summary.

Best regards 

Olga Cavalli





2015-07-17 6:46 GMT-03:00 Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>:
All,

Per the co-chairs request please find attached the analysis of the GAC comments to the CCWG.

Cheers.

B.

PS I will circulate the open format version later.

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community