Dear Colleagues,
A quick way to contribute to this call for comment would be to to
submit a CCWG comment saying : stall the AoC reviews until approval
of the new Bylaws which will be related to these reviews.
Same for organizational reviews to avoid potential conflicting
priorities with the SO/AC accountability discussion.
Icann could, as a consequence, allocate more resources to supporting
our work ;-)
I am conscious this is very last minute, and don't want to rrush any
decision. Unless there is clear support or other views getting
traction within our group, we will most certainly abstain.
best
Mathieu
Le 24/06/2015 19:02, Alice Jansen a
écrit :
Dear all,
A session on
AoC and Organizational Reviews:
Supporting ICANN Accountability took place this
morning at ICANN53. This session
covered Reviews defined by the Affirmation of
Commitments (AoC) and Organizational Reviews, mandated by
ICANN's Bylaws. Topics included: proposed schedule for
upcoming reviews, proposed process and operational
improvements to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of
reviews, implementation status of recommendations from the
Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team
(ATRT2), the Security, Stability & Resiliency of the
DNS Review (SSR) and the "WHOIS Policy" Review (WHOIS).
If you have any
questions about this public comment proceeding, please
contact Larisa Gurnick at
larisa.gurnick@icann.org.
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
mathieu.weill@afnic.fr
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************