Dear Bruce,

Thank you again for providing our group with the Board comment.

As raised in the CCWG call today, we are kindly requesting if the Board could provide our group with a response to the following question.

What are the legal basis and criteria  by which the Board considers a given Recommendation to be contrary to the Global Public Interest ?

Clarification would really be useful to help our group, but also the Chartering Organizations, to check our own recommendations.

Thank you for sharing this email with the Board, and happy to expand on the question if need be.

Best,

Thomas, Leon & Mathieu

Co-chairs

De : accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Bruce Tonkin
Envoyé : lundi 14 décembre 2015 11:49
À : Accountability Cross Community
Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: FW: ICANN Board Comments on Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations

Hello Jordan,

Thanks for posting to the list.

The comments are also available in the public comment forum at:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00011.html

We had a half day meeting of the full Board on Thursday 10 Dec, and then spent a few hours again with the full Board finalizing the comments yesterday – Sunday 13 Dec.      That was in addition to another half day meeting held on Saturday 5 Dec.   All dates are relative to my time zone J

Regards,

Bruce Tonkin