As I understand it, the transition process will be considered and refined, refined and considered, till the US Government decides if the transition can legally occur in the first place.

Ron

From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>;
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>;
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin
Sent: Wed, Oct 14, 2015 2:18:11 AM

Thanks Thomas, very helpful.

 

Is it possible to get a definition of the meaning of the status  “to be considered” and “to be refined”.

 

I am guessing that a rough match to the Board’s terminology is that a “to be considered’ is a 1B and “to be refined” is a 1A – but just want to check.  

 

Thanks,

Bruce Tonkin

 

 

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Rickert
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2015 10:48 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community@icann.org>
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Scorecard for Dublin

 

All,

Mathieu has kindly updated a Google doc he had prepared some time ago. 

 

It is a scorecard displaying the various areas of work and their respective completion status. 

 


There's a lot of yellow "to be refined" which we should be able to turn into green in Dublin.

 

Kind regards,

Thomas