Hi,
Model UN, now I understand the problem You did model UN.
Polite hyperbola is the rule.
My issue is that if we don't recognize the mechanisms we have,
albeit imperfect, we can't fix them
To say we have none means we need to start from scratch, and that
would be unfortunate. We have a lot to build on.
I also disagree with the notion that we need just OFS - one
[fundamental] source - of accountability. We need a system of
checks and balances with some binding bits. That is why in the
other CWG I am against nuclear options as the only defense, it is so
messy having only a sledge hammer when there are tasks to be done
around the house.
avri
On 29-Jan-15 17:28, Jonathan Zuck
wrote:
Ok, if I was back in Model UN, I would argue
that non-binding accountability is
not accountability but since we all have lives and have a
charter to come up with a type of accountability we all agree we
do NOT have, I guess my only point is let’s focus on getting
that in place.