I agree with Kavouss.  I think it would be terribly irresponsible of us to make the kind of reforms we need for WS1 with only one single 20-day comment period.  There are significant impacts to these measures that must be explored by the community before we could possibly undertake them.  We are redesigning a global governance institution and need to take the time to do it right, which includes community consultation and an iterative process of reaching recommendations.  This cannot be achieved without a reply or 2nd comment period to take the public comments on board.  Nor can it be done before we have independent legal advice that the community can weigh and consider.  These are complex issues with significant implications for many stakeholders - more significant than anything ICANN has done in a decade.  

Larry Strickling has said several times that 30 Sept is not a deadline and that the IANA contract would be extended while the community takes the necessary time to get the important issues right.

Thanks,

Robin

On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:

Dear Jordan,

Dear Co Chairs

Dear All,

I think one public comment is not sufficient , Why for such an important issue only one period is forseen unless we are of the strong view that one dialogue between CCWG and the entire community is enough,in particular, for WS2 as the scope , nature and extent of that stream  is too complex .

We need to revisit this item again.

Regards

Kavouss

 

2015-03-22 16:57 GMT+01:00 Jordan Carter <jordan@internetnz.net.nz>:

It's important to be clear that the current schedule proposes:

ONE public comment period for WorkStream 1 matters (pre-transition)

ONE public comment period for WorkStream 2 matters (post-transition)

It remains to be seen whether it is possible to construct our pre-transition proposal based on one comment period - hopefully this will be clear by Tuesday afternoon.

bests

Jordan

On 22 March 2015 at 17:51, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Kavouss,

According to the timeline, there seem to be two 40 days public comments planned for the ccwg.

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20150129/c9bfee6e/ICG-CWG-CCWG_timeline_20150129-0001.pdf

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.

On 22 Mar 2015 13:27, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear All,

May somebody kindly mention how many public comments are foreseen and what are the period(s) deadline for comments

It is important that atleast two public comments to be foreseen each with atleast 21 days response period

KAVOUSS  

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

--

Jordan Carter

Chief Executive
InternetNZ

04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
jordan@internetnz.net.nz
Skype: jordancarter

A better world through a better Internet 

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community