Andrew,

I am sorry, you missed the point that I raised

The point was ,with ST18, the GAC will totally be disabled to agree on such consensus  ADVICE as one single government  could always oppose to the Advice. This was purposely injected in the Recommendation

That is the meaning of rare advice.

Pls kindly read the text as it MEANT and kindly not turn it around

Regards

Kavouss .

2016-02-21 23:38 GMT+01:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>:

Hi,

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:12:57PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>
> *Consequently the so-called special privilege repeatedly referred to  by
> others would in fact very rarely happens *

In that case, of course, the carve-out doesn't take effect anyway.  So
if this is in fact to be so rare, why would anyone argue that it needs
to be changed?  The argument, "Such-and-thus effect is never going to
happen, so we must set up the procedures around it perfectly," doesn't
really seem to hang together.

Best regards,

A


--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community